OptimalPacing.com

OptimalPacing.com

Open Letter to Physicians: Reevaluating Convential Pacing

In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence that suggests chronic right ventricular (RV) apical pacing can cause a variety of adverse effects in patients, particularly those with intact atrial-ventricular (AV) function. Studies have demonstrated that atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular dysfunction, and congestive heart failure may either arise or be exacerbated by the mechanical dyssynchrony and ventricular chamber dysfunction that occur with chronic, apical ventricular stimulation.

The Danish Study, CTOPP, MOST Sub-Study, and DAVID clinical trials all either directly or indirectly show benefits of preserving intrinsic AV conduction or the intrinsic ventricular activation sequence whenever possible.  Long-term risks associated with chronic RV apical pacing have been identified. Studies suggest that clinical efforts should be attempted to optimize pacing strategies, significantly decrease unnecessary RV pacing, and promote normal activation. Among solutions are novel pacing algorithms or modes and selective site pacing.

Topics related to optimal pacing include:

Featured Optimal Pacing Articles:

Right Ventricular Pacing

Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) Trial

Selective Site Pacing

Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing

Biventricular Pacing for AV Block

Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: Feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients

Long-Term Surveillance of HF and AF

Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: Report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST)